Archives

Death Of Kathleen McNeill, Thurles, Co. Tipperary.

It was with great sadness that we learned of the death on Tuesday 3rd November 2026, of Mrs Kathleen McNeill (née Hickey), No.20 Collins Park, Thurles, Co. Tipperary.

Pre-deceased by her son Philip, parents Paddy and Mary Hickey, grandson Philip, brother Pat and son-in-law Jim (Corcoran); Mrs McNeill, sadly, passed away while in the care of staff at Mercy University Hospital, Cork.

Her passing is most deeply regretted, sadly missed and lovingly remembered by her sorrowing family; husband Philip sons Patrick, Wesley, Trevor and Stephen, daughters Angela, Leona and Yvonne, daughters-in-law Tina, Kathleen and Kirsten, sons-in-law Trevor and David, adored grandchildren and great grandchildren, sister Ann, sister-in-law Mary, brother-in-law Kevin, nieces, nephews, extended relatives, neighbours and many friends.

Requiescat in Pace.

Funeral Arrangements.

The earthly remains of Mrs McNeill will repose at her home, (Eircode E41 TX44), on Saturday afternoon, November 7th, from 4:00pm until 7:00pm, same evening.
Her remains will be received into the nearby Church of St Joseph and St Brigid, Bohernanave, Thurles, Eircode (E41 HT44), on Sunday morning, November 8th, at 9:00am, to further repose for Requiem Mass at 9:30am, followed by interment, immediately afterwards, in St Patrick’s cemetery, Moyne Road, Lognafulla, Thurles, Co. Tipperary.

For those persons who would wish to attend Requiem Mass for Mrs McNeill, but for reasons cannot, same can be viewed streamed live online, HERE.

The extended McNeill and Hickey families wish to express their appreciation for your understanding at this difficult time, and have made arrangements for those persons wishing to send messages of condolence, to use the link shown HERE.

North Tipperary & Mid-West Region Records Lowest Cardiac Arrest Transport Rate Nationally.

Deputy Joe Cooney Calls For Examination Of Emergency Response Capacity And Ambulance Provision Across North Tipperary, Clare & Limerick.

Deputy Joe Cooney TD.

The Mid-West recorded the lowest proportion of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients transported to hospital in Ireland in 2025, alongside the lowest rate of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), [ROSC is the resumption of a sustained, natural heart rhythm and effective blood circulation after cardiac arrest] according to figures provided by the National Ambulance Service (NAS) to Fine Gael TD Joe Cooney.

Deputy Cooney said these figures raised important questions about emergency response capacity and ambulance provision across North Tipperary, Clare and Limerick, particularly given the region’s combination of longer ambulance response times and lower rates of ROSC and hospital transport.

The figures, released in response to parliamentary questions submitted by Deputy Cooney, show that just 29% of cardiac arrest patients in the Mid-West were transported to hospital last year, compared with a national average of 38%. Of the 233 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases recorded in the Mid-West where resuscitation was attempted or continued, just 68 patients were transported to hospital.
The region also recorded a median ambulance call-to-scene response time of 17 minutes, compared with the national median of 15 minutes. This was joint highest nationally, alongside the West and North West region.

The figures further show that the Mid-West had the lowest rate of return of spontaneous circulation, at 21%, compared with the national average of 25%. The proportion of patients achieving ROSC on arrival at hospital was also the lowest nationally, at 17%, against a national average of 20%.
The percentage of patients surviving to hospital discharge in the Mid-West was 7.3%, compared with 9.7% nationally.

Deputy Cooney said, “When somebody suffers a cardiac arrest, every minute matters. The speed of the emergency response and the availability of appropriate resources can be critical. While the National Ambulance Service has advised that there is no statistically significant difference in survival rates between the regions, the combination of these figures raises legitimate questions about how emergency services are operating across the Mid-West. We need to understand whether there are particular challenges arising from the region’s geography, rural communities, ambulance deployment or access to emergency hospital services.People living in rural parts of Clare, in particular, need to have confidence that they can access an effective and timely emergency response when they need it.”

In its response, the National Ambulance Service said that a higher proportion of cardiac arrest patients were transported to hospital in the more urban regions, particularly Dublin and the North East and Dublin and Midlands regions.
However, it also stated that there was no evidence that a higher proportion of patients being transported was associated with higher survival.

The NAS cautioned that regional differences in survival outcomes should be interpreted carefully because of the relatively small number of cases, adding that there was no statistically significant difference in survival to hospital discharge between the six HSE Health Regions.
Deputy Cooney said he would be seeking further clarification from the HSE and National Ambulance Service on the factors contributing to the figures.

“I want to establish what work has been undertaken to examine why the Mid-West has the lowest transport rate and whether differences in ambulance response times, rural coverage or the availability of resources are contributing factors. I will also be seeking information on ambulance deployment across the region, the role of community first responder schemes and what additional measures could help improve emergency response times. This is about ensuring that people in Clare, Limerick and North Tipperary receive the same standard of emergency care and have the best possible chance of survival when faced with a life-threatening medical emergency.”

These figures are deeply concerning, particularly for rural communities in North Tipperary. The question must now be asked: Why are our North Co. Tipperary TDs, (namely Lowry, Kelly & O’Meara), all remaining so silent on such a serious issue? Where is the outrage, the accountability and the demand for better ambulance services? When lives are at stake, silence is simply not good enough. The people of Tipperary deserve answers and action, not excuses.

Poor Management Of Wastewater Treatment Plants By Uisce Éireann Continues To Harm Our Environment.

  • 55% of wastewater treatment plants in Ireland discharged wastewater that failed to meet EPA standards designed to prevent pollution.
  • Failures at half of these treatment plants were due to inadequate operation and maintenance.
  • Four more towns and villages stopped discharging raw sewage following connection to new treatment plants.
  • Essential wastewater infrastructure upgrades needed to prevent pollution and protect the environment are not being delivered quickly enough.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published its Urban Wastewater Treatment in 2025. The report today, highlights the need to accelerate the delivery of wastewater infrastructure and improve the operation and maintenance of existing treatment plants.

Effluent and waste water flowing into the river Suir in Thurles, Town centre for the past 13 years.

Investment at priority areas identified by the EPA continues to deliver environmental improvements while supporting housing development and sustainable economic growth. However, the necessary treatment infrastructure is not being delivered quickly enough or at the scale required. Furthermore, existing treatment plants are not being properly operated and maintained, undermining the environmental benefits of increased investment in new wastewater infrastructure. As a result, wastewater discharges continue to harm water quality in rivers, estuaries, lakes and coastal waters, and pose a risk to human health.

Wastewater discharged from 55% of licensed treatment plants did not consistently meet the standards set in wastewater discharge licences by the EPA to prevent pollution and protect the environment. Roughly half of failures were due to deficient infrastructure, while the other half were due to poor operation and maintenance.

Launching the report, Mr Pat Byrne, Director of the EPA’s Office of Radiation Protection and Environmental Monitoring said: “Investment in new treatment plants is helping to protect the environment and delivering benefits for local communities, such as in Ramelton, Rathmullan and Milford in Co. Donegal. However, EPA inspections continue to identify poor operational practices and inadequate maintenance of wastewater infrastructure, resulting in wastewater being discharged without proper treatment and adversely impacting water quality. Many of these failures could and should have been prevented, and Uisce Éireann must take immediate and effective action to address these failings.”

While operation and maintenance issues can be addressed in the short term, upgrading deficient infrastructure is a longer-term challenge because of the scale of work involved and the investment required. The EPA has identified 72 priority areas where action is most urgently needed to prevent pollution and protect the environment. These include 13 towns and cities that failed to meet mandatory European-wide wastewater treatment standards introduced more than thirty years ago.

Mr Noel Byrne, EPA Programme Manager, said: “It is encouraging to see critical infrastructure projects such as the upgrade of Ringsend treatment plant being delivered. However, progress by Uisce Éireann in delivering works at many EPA priority areas remains too slow, with around 60% of these areas still not started. This is prolonging impacts on the environment. Uisce Éireann must accelerate the delivery of these essential improvements.”

The EPA’s Urban Wastewater Treatment in 2025 report and the list of priority areas are available on the EPA website. The priority areas list includes the environmental issues at each location and Uisce Éireann’s plans to address them.

Liberty Recycling Controversy Raises Serious Questions About Charity Governance and Accountability.

The unfolding controversy surrounding Liberty Recycling, a Dublin-based charity chaired by Sinn Féin TD Mr Aengus Ó Snodaigh, raises even more troubling questions about financial oversight, corporate governance and the protection of public funds.
What began as a Garda investigation into suspected money laundering has developed into a major examination of how a charitable organisation, established to provide employment and training opportunities for people affected by drug addiction, was managed and supervised.

According to evidence presented to the High Court, investigators are examining substantial international financial transfers through the charity’s bank accounts that appeared inconsistent with its normal activities. Gardaí have seized luxury vehicles and other high-value goods, including BMW X5s, Rolex watches and designer handbags, with assets valued at approximately €300,000.
The investigation has also raised questions about the purchase of other expensive vehicles, including a Porsche, and the establishment of separate commercial entities associated with the charity.

Particularly concerning are the findings presented by the Charities Regulator, which alleged that there was little or no effective management or oversight of the charity’s activities by its trustees and directors.
The regulator also raised concerns that the charity’s operations, assets and financial arrangements had become intertwined with those of separate companies that were not registered charities.

A further complication concerns a letter submitted in connection with the establishment of one of those companies, Liberty Developments. The document bore a signature attributed to Mr Aengus Ó Snodaigh, who disputes its authenticity and maintains that he neither signed it nor authorised anyone else to sign on his behalf.
The authenticity of that signature remains unresolved and is a matter requiring independent examination.

It is important to emphasise that there is no evidence presented to date that Mr Ó Snodaigh or the other charity trustees were involved in, or aware of, the suspected criminal activity. Mr Ó Snodaigh is not personally under criminal investigation.
However, the absence of evidence of criminal involvement does not remove the wider questions surrounding the responsibilities of those entrusted with overseeing charitable organisations.

Charity trustees have a duty to safeguard assets, ensure proper financial controls, understand the organisations operating under their supervision and protect the purposes for which charitable funds are provided. These responsibilities become particularly important where public funding is involved.

Liberty Recycling reportedly received more than €2 million in State funding in recent years through employment-related programmes. Its financial difficulties and subsequent closure have placed approximately 100 jobs and training opportunities at risk.

The High Court has appointed provisional liquidators following an application by the Charities Regulator, placing the charity’s affairs under independent control. Beyond the financial investigation, there is a genuine human cost. Workers, trainees and vulnerable individuals who depended on the organisation now face uncertainty about their futures.
The central issue is not simply whether criminal wrongdoing occurred. It is also whether the systems designed to prevent financial misconduct, protect charitable assets and ensure accountability were sufficiently robust.

There are legitimate questions that deserve answers.
How were substantial international financial transactions monitored? What oversight existed over the creation of associated commercial companies? How were major vehicle purchases authorised? What safeguards protected public funding? And how could a document bearing a disputed signature enter the corporate record?
These questions must be answered through proper investigation, independent scrutiny and established legal processes, without prejudging anyone’s guilt.

The Liberty Recycling controversy should also prompt a broader examination of charity regulation in Ireland.
Public confidence in the charitable sector depends on transparency, effective oversight and the responsible management of money donated or provided for the public good.
Thousands of legitimate charities carry out invaluable work across the country. Their reputations should not be undermined by weaknesses in the governance of individual organisations.
Accountability is not an accusation of criminal guilt. It is a fundamental responsibility of anyone entrusted with managing charitable resources, particularly where public money and vulnerable communities are involved.

The priority must now be to establish the full facts, protect those affected and ensure that appropriate lessons are learned. The public deserves nothing less.

Tipperary’s And Ireland’s EV Charging Rip-Off.

Going Electric Should Not Cost More Than Diesel!

Ireland is encouraging motorists to switch to electric vehicles, but the rising cost of public charging is now threatening one of the biggest reasons for making that switch; saving money. A press report published on November 4th 2026 highlights a serious concern. Charging an electric vehicle at some public charging stations can now cost MORE per kilometre than driving a petrol or diesel car. And this is not just a problem with expensive motorway rapid chargers.
Both SLOW public charging and FAST public charging are becoming increasingly expensive.

The Latest Confirmed Esb Charging Prices
Following the latest ESB price increases on November 2nd 2026:
Slow / Standard Public Charging (Ac) – Pay-as-you-go: 70 cent per kWh. Contactless payment: 72 cent per kWh. Generally used for kerbside, town and neighbourhood charging.
Fast / Rapid Public Charging (Dc) – Pay-as-you-go: 83 cent per kWh. Contactless payment: 85 cent per kWh. Typically used at motorway service stations and rapid charging hubs.
Home Charging – Can cost as little as 12 cent per kWh on certain discounted night-time tariffs.

Think about that for a moment.
A motorist using an ESB rapid public charger and paying by contactless card can now pay more than SEVEN TIMES the electricity rate available to someone charging at home for 12 cent per kWh. Even using a slower public charger at 70 cent per kWh costs nearly SIX TIMES that cheap home rate.

How Does This Compare With Diesel?
Electric family car using expensive public rapid charging – Almost €70 for approximately 450 km of winter driving.
Family diesel car – Approximately €110 for around 950 km.
That works out at: Electric vehicle: €15.56 per 100 km. Diesel vehicle: €11.58 per 100 km.
In this particular comparison, the electric vehicle costs approximately 34% MORE per kilometre than your diesel car.
These are illustrative vehicle and charging costs, not a claim that every electric car is more expensive than every diesel car.

The Real Problem Is Fairness
People with private driveways and access to cheaper home electricity can still make substantial savings by driving electric vehicles.
But what about motorists living in: Apartments? Terraced houses without driveways? Homes without private parking? Areas where home charging simply isn’t possible?
These motorists may have little choice but to depend on public charging. They are effectively being charged substantially more simply because they cannot install a charger at home. And even when they choose slower public charging instead of rapid charging, the price can still be many times higher than charging at home.

More Chargers Alone Will Not Solve This Problem.
The Government has announced its National EV Charging Infrastructure Strategy 2026–2028. More charging infrastructure is certainly needed. But what is the point of installing thousands of additional chargers if ordinary motorists cannot afford to use them?
According to press reports, the Department of Transport currently has no plans to regulate public EV charging prices.

The latter raises an important question; who is protecting motorists from excessive public charging costs?

Ireland needs:

  • Affordable public charging, both slow and rapid.
  • Clear and transparent prices across all charging networks.
  • Fair charging options for apartment residents and households without driveways.
  • Greater competition and scrutiny of public charging tariffs.
  • A Government strategy that addresses the cost of charging, not simply the number of chargers installed.

The Bottom Line
Electric vehicles are supposed to offer motorists a cleaner and more economical alternative to petrol and diesel. For people who can charge at home cheaply, that financial advantage often remains.
But for motorists who depend entirely on public charging, the situation is becoming very different.
Ireland cannot expect motorists to make the transition to electric vehicles, while allowing public charging to become more expensive than the petrol and diesel alternatives it is supposed to replace.
A fair transition must work for everyone, not just homeowners with private driveways.

Ireland Doesn’t Just Need More Ev Chargers. It Needs Public Charging That Ordinary Motorists Can Afford.
Do you think the Government should regulate public EV charging prices to protect motorists?